{"id":7237,"date":"2016-10-12T13:38:54","date_gmt":"2016-10-12T06:38:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/?p=1561"},"modified":"2016-10-12T13:38:54","modified_gmt":"2016-10-12T06:38:54","slug":"ajimbar-s-h-m-h-raih-doktor-usai-teliti-pelaksanaan-tugas-kejari-dalam-pemberantasan-tpk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/ajimbar-s-h-m-h-raih-doktor-usai-teliti-pelaksanaan-tugas-kejari-dalam-pemberantasan-tpk\/","title":{"rendered":"Ajimbar, S.H., M.H. Earns Doctorate After Researching the Prosecutor\u2019s Office Role in Combating Corruption"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/sites\/1043\/2016\/11\/IMG_2976.jpg\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1562\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-1562 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/sites\/1043\/2016\/11\/IMG_2976.jpg\" alt=\"img_2976\" width=\"600\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The Indonesian Prosecutor\u2019s Office is one of three state institutions authorized to investigate corruption cases in Indonesia. Before the implementation of an optimization system, the Prosecutor\u2019s Office assessed its effectiveness in combating corruption based on a target system. Under this system, the institution was considered \u201cfairly effective\u201d in combating corruption. Ajimbar, S.H., M.H. explained this during his doctoral promotion examination on Tuesday (11\/10).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\u201cThe institution is considered effective if it reaches the target of 1,457 cases,\u201d Ajimbar said. He explained that, based on data obtained through his research, the Prosecutor\u2019s Office handled an average of 1,284.3 corruption cases each year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\" class=\"translation-block\">Ajimbar identified several factors that hinder the performance of the Prosecutor\u2019s Office in combating corruption. In his dissertation, entitled Kajian Pelaksanaan Tugas Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Indeks Prestasi Penyidikan (A Study of the Implementation of the Duties of the Indonesian Prosecutor\u2019s Office in Combating Corruption Based on the Investigation Performance Index), he identified three categories of obstacles: legislation, internal factors within the Prosecutor\u2019s Office, and external factors.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Certain laws and regulations have restricted the Prosecutor\u2019s Office from taking repressive measures against certain corruption suspects. These include Constitutional Court Decision No. 73\/PUU-IX\/2011 and Law No. 9 of 2015, particularly Article 384 paragraph (1). Under these provisions, investigators must first obtain written permission from the President, the Minister of Home Affairs acting on behalf of the President, or the relevant regional head before taking action against certain corruption suspects.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\" class=\"translation-block\">Ajimbar also raised concerns about the regulation of the death penalty for corruption offenders, as stipulated in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law No. 31 of 1999 jo. Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption. Under the provision, a corruption offender may be sentenced to death when the offense is committed under certain circumstances. However, the criteria defining these \u201ccertain circumstances\u201d have not been clearly formulated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\u201cOur recommendation as the promoter is that the criteria for these certain circumstances should be clearly stipulated in the corruption legislation. It must also be clear which authority is responsible for determining those circumstances. For example, would it be the TNI Commander when the country is in an insecure situation, the Minister of Finance during a monetary crisis, or the Minister of Environment in the event of a natural disaster? These matters need to be clearly regulated,\u201d Ajimbar emphasized.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Regarding internal obstacles within the Prosecutor\u2019s Office, Ajimbar stressed the importance of instilling a strong sense of national service among its personnel. \u201cThere are many obstacles to taking repressive measures at the investigation stage. When prosecutors lack a strong sense of dedication, it becomes difficult to achieve results,\u201d he said. (Lita)<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia (Kejari) merupakan salah satu dari tiga lembaga negara yang diberi kewanangan untuk melakukan penyidikan terhadap kasus tindak pidana korupsi (TPK) di Indonesia. Kejari, sebelum diberlakukannya sistem optimalisasi, menggunakan sistem target dalam menilai efektivitasnya memberantas TPK. Berdasarkan sistem target, dalam pelaksanaannya Kejari dinilai \u201ccukup efektif\u201d dalam memberantas TPK. Hal tersebut disampaikan Ajimbar, S.H., [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-berita"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}