{"id":34538,"date":"2025-06-24T08:45:32","date_gmt":"2025-06-24T01:45:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/?p=34538"},"modified":"2025-06-24T09:28:24","modified_gmt":"2025-06-24T02:28:24","slug":"fh-ugm-dan-babinkum-tni-gelar-bimtek-orditur-militer-fokus-pada-penegakan-hukum-dan-koneksitas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/fh-ugm-dan-babinkum-tni-gelar-bimtek-orditur-militer-fokus-pada-penegakan-hukum-dan-koneksitas\/","title":{"rendered":"UGM Law School and the TNI Military Legal Affairs Division Hold a Military Prosecutor Training Workshop, Focusing on Law Enforcement and Coordination"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Thursday (June 19, 2025), a legal outreach event titled \u201cTechnical Guidance for Military Prosecutors for the 2025 Academic Year\u201d<\/em><\/strong> was held. This event is part of a strategy to strengthen the quality of human resources within the TNI Legal Affairs Agency (Babinkum) in response to the increasingly challenging dynamics of military law. The event was initiated by the TNI Legal Development Agency, in collaboration with MIH UGM (Jakarta Campus) Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, as an academic partner with expertise in the field of law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bimbingan teknis ini difokuskan untuk mendorong peningkatan kompetensi dan profesionalisme para orditur militer dalam menangani perkara pidana, terutama tindak pidana korupsi yang berkaitan dengan pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Dalam pelatihan ini, peserta diberikan pemahaman komprehensif mengenai landasan hukum, ruang lingkup, serta pola-pola korupsi yang kerap ditemui di lapangan. Peserta juga dilatih untuk menyusun strategi penanganan perkara secara sistematis mulai dari tahap penyelidikan hingga penuntutan. Selain itu, materi pelatihan menitikberatkan pada penguasaan teknik penyidikan yang tepat dan pemahaman terhadap penggunaan alat bukti elektronik dalam perkara koneksitas, sebagai respons terhadap tantangan pembuktian hukum di era digital saat ini.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The event began at 8:00 a.m. with opening remarks by the Associate Dean for Research, Community Service, and Information Systems, Dr. Heribertus Jaka Triyana, S.H., LL.M., M.A., followed by remarks from the Chair of the TNI Legal Development Agency, Rear Admiral Farid Ma\u2019ruf, S.H., M.H. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first session was led by Richo Andi Wibowo, S.H., LL.M., Ph.D., a lecturer in the Department of Administrative Law at the Faculty of Law, UGM, who presented on the topic of Handling Criminal Offenses in the Goods and Services Procurement Sector. In the discussion session led by Richo, government procurement of goods and services (PBJP) was portrayed as a complex arena where various legal regimes intersect: administrative, civil, and even criminal law. He highlighted that corruption in procurement often stems from administrative violations, such as the manipulation of specifications and non-competitive tendering methods, which then escalate into violations of competition law and civil law.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Richo emphasized the importance of distinguishing between purely administrative violations and those that could potentially constitute criminal acts of corruption. Not all procedural errors warrant criminal prosecution, especially if no malicious intent or personal gain is found. In practice, a number of cases have shown disproportionate law enforcement, which can create undue fear among procurement officials. Therefore, a more cautious and fair legal approach is needed, with context and intent serving as key factors in determining whether a violation constitutes corruption or not. This discussion serves as a reminder of the importance of systemic reform within the Public Procurement System (PBJP) so that oversight and law enforcement are not only firm but also fair and prudent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the second session, titled \u201cLaw Enforcement in Corruption Cases and Jurisdictional Connectivity,\u201d Dr. Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar, a lecturer in Criminal Law at the Faculty of Law, UGM, thoroughly examined the dynamics of handling corruption cases involving both military and civilian elements. The main discourse centered on the clarity of jurisdiction and the mechanisms of connectivity between military courts and corruption criminal courts. It was emphasized that within the framework of a systematic lex specialis, corruption cases should be handled within the jurisdiction of corruption criminal courts, including when military personnel are involved. In practice, challenges arise, such as discrepancies in sentencing and legal approaches due to the splitting of cases, which can actually threaten legal certainty. Through concrete examples such as the Corruption Court Decision No. 19\/Pid.Sus-TPK\/2023\/PN.Jkt.Pst, this forum highlights the importance of the connectivity framework as a legal obligation, not merely a matter of authority. To that end, coordination between the Attorney General\u2019s Office and the General Audit Office must be strengthened to ensure integrated case handling. The concept of connectivity is not merely a technical solution but a reflection of the need for a fair and cohesive legal system in a country governed by the rule of law, such as Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further discussion regarding electronic evidence in cases of joint jurisdiction has become a key focus in efforts to strengthen the modern criminal justice system. In his presentation, Dr. Sigid Riyanto, S.H., M.Si., emphasized that electronic evidence now plays a strategic role, particularly in handling cases that involve both civil and military elements simultaneously. Connected cases demand evidentiary procedures that adhere to principles while also being responsive to technological advancements. Digital information, printouts of electronic documents, and lawful intercepts can all now serve as valid evidence provided they meet formal and material requirements. Regarding connected cases, the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) mandates that such cases be processed through inter-institutional cooperation between the Prosecutor\u2019s Office and the Military Prosecutor\u2019s Office. This is where the importance of electronic evidence lies: as a response to the limitations of conventional evidence, and as part of a reform of evidentiary law that is more adaptive and accurate. Nevertheless, emphasis remains on the validity of the evidence-gathering process to ensure it does not violate human rights. This material demonstrates that electronic evidence is not merely a supplement, but a foundation for unraveling increasingly complex interconnected cases in the digital age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Through a legal outreach program titled \u201cTechnical Guidance for Military Prosecutors for the 2025 Academic Year\u201d<\/em><\/strong>, the program emphasized the urgency of enhancing the capacity and professionalism of law enforcement officials within the military to address increasingly complex legal challenges, particularly in corruption cases involving the procurement of goods and services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As part of its contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)<\/strong>, this initiative supports SDG 4<\/strong> (Quality Education) by strengthening the professional capacity of military legal personnel; SDG 16<\/strong> (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) through the strengthening of a transparent and accountable legal system; and SDG 17<\/strong> (Partnerships for the Goals) through strategic collaboration between educational institutions and state institutions. The UGM Faculty of Law reaffirms its commitment to being an active partner in building a national legal system that is adaptive and responsive to the challenges of the digital age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Author: Ramzy Oansa Ilham<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kamis (19\/6\/2025), telah berlangsung kegiatan Penyuluhan Hukum bertajuk \u201cBimbingan Teknis Profesi Orditur Militer Tahun Ajaran 2025\u201d. Kegiatan ini merupakan bagian dari strategi penguatan kualitas sumber daya manusia di lingkungan Babinkum TNI dalam merespons dinamika hukum militer yang kian menantang. Acara ini diinisiasi oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum TNI, bekerja sama dengan MIH UGM (Kampus Jakarta) Fakultas […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":95,"featured_media":34547,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,218],"tags":[240,241,321,320,228,239,227,220],"class_list":["post-34538","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-berita","category-berita-sdgs","tag-fakultas-hukum-ugm","tag-law-ugm","tag-magister-ilmu-hukum-ugm-kampus-jakarta-2","tag-mih-ugm-kampus-jakarta","tag-sdg-16-perdamaian-keadilan-dan-kelembagaan-yang-tangguh","tag-sdg-17-kemitraan-untuk-mencapai-tujuan","tag-sdg-4-pendidikan-berkualitas","tag-sdgs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/95"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34538"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34538\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34546,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34538\/revisions\/34546"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34547"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.ugm.ac.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}